Ye Cong Mo vs Xing Dao Chen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Sep at 09:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Cong Mo vs X. Dao Chen

CHN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mo 2 - 0 Chen
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ye Cong Mo winning 4 and Xing Dao Chen winning 0. The last match between Ye Cong Mo and Xing Dao Chen was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 07-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Ye Cong Mo getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mo | 2 |
| Chen | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Guangzhou Challenger(09-07-25)
(R2) M25 Fuzhou(07-20-23)
Y. C. Mo vs X. D. Chen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.92% (174-107) | Career Total W/L | 56.10% (69-54) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. C. Mo vs X. D. Chen Match Preview:
- How do they compare in second serve performance? Mo has a 44.12% win rate on their second serve points recently, while Chen achieves 38.87%.
- Considering recent return stats, Mo wins 47.4% of their opponent’s second serve points, compared to Chen’s 46.38%. Interestingly, Chen leads in returning first serves at 27.86%, surpassing Mo’s 25.47%.
- Under pressure, Mo saves breakpoints at a rate of 52.29%, whereas Chen's success rate is slightly lower at 48.28%.
- In terms of overall match success in the past year, Mo has a 50% win rate, while Chen has a slightly better win rate of 53.97%.
- Where do they excel on different surfaces? Mo performs best on Hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Chen excels on Indoor Hard courts with the same win rate.
- Both have played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, with Mo winning 54.29% and Chen 54.84% of these matches, showing a similar level of proficiency.
- Chen faces tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 291.48, while Mo's opponents have an average rank of 448.45.
- Can they handle the pressure of a deciding set? Chen is more successful, winning 53% of deciding sets, compared to Mo's 42%.
- In terms of breaking serves, Mo converts 33.57% of opportunities, whereas Chen is slightly lower at 30.17%.
Editorial Prediction (September 7, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing second serve performance, Mo holds a clear advantage with a higher percentage of points won compared to Chen. This could be a decisive factor in prolonged rallies and matches.
The return game stats are pivotal in this comparison. Mo excels in returning second serves, but Chen counterbalances this with effectively returning first serves. This aspect reflects their differing strengths and can tilt the match in either direction.
In dissecting high-pressure scenarios, Mo shows better ability to save breakpoints, illustrating mental toughness during critical moments. However, Chen's determination shows through a higher success rate in deciding sets.
Overall annual performance edges slightly in Chen's favor, underscoring consistent play against competitive opponents. The strength of opposition analyses also illustrates Chen's experience against higher-ranked players.
Mo's ability on hard surfaces is notable, yet Chen’s numerous matches and historic performance on indoor hard could play a critical role in balance if surface familiarity is key.
Considering all these facets, the match outcome remains a closely contested prediction with Chen likely holding a subtle edge due to a tougher competition background and clutch play in deciding sets.
Given the data at hand, Chen is projected to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis encounter.
Ye Cong Mo vs Xing Dao Chen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. C. Mo vs X. D. Chen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 14 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:40:56 | Average Match Time | 1:40:56 |
| 61% (71/117) | 1st Serve % | 58% (66/113) |
| 76% (54/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (43/66) |
| 57% (26/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (18/47) |
| 75% (9/12) | Break Pts Won % | 21% (3/14) |
| 46% (52/113) | Return Points Win % | 32% (37/117) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. C. Mo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(1) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
X. D. Chen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(7) 3-6 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

Y. C. Mo vs X. D. Chen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.92% (174/107) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.10% (69/54) |
| 59.94% (374/250) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.55% (150/125) |
| 55.18% (3142/2552) | Games Win/Loss | 52.87% (1336/1191) |
| 62.14% (151/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (56/42) |
| 61.29% (19/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 640 | Aces Total | 78 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 611 | Total Double Faults | 246 |
| 1:14:31 | Average Match Time | 1:14:55 |
| 399.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 258.07 |
| 59% (8003/13579) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3260/4924) |
| 68% (5425/8003) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2028/3260) |
| 51% (2867/5576) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (763/1664) |
| 45% (722/1594) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (240/555) |
| 42% (5987/14136) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2120/5068) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (18/20) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 64.46% (156/86) | Futures W/L | 58.47% (69/49) |
| 63% (169/270) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (64/117) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 38% (23/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (9/24) |
| 57% (40/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 88% (171/150) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (68/58) |
| 12% (171/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (68/10) |
| 20% (109/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (55/10) |